SUNBURY - A day after his clients had felony charges dismissed against them for lack of evidence in connection with a high-profile raid at their Sunbury home that netted $50,000 in drugs and cash, Attorney Greg Stuck said he hopes District Attorney Ann Targonski will be more "responsible" in future investigations.
When asked if he planned to sue anyone in the case that he claimed brought humiliation to Earl Adams Sr., 66, and his 50-year-old wife, Linda, Stuck said, "I'm keeping my legal options open."
During a preliminary hearing Tuesday, Magisterial District Judge Benjamin Apfelbaum dismissed felony counts of possession with intent to deliver marijuana and conspiracy against the Sunbury couple and their son's girlfriend, Cheyenne Ross, 21, who was represented by Attorney David Noon.
After listening to arguments from the defense attorneys and Assistant District Attorney Michael Toomey, the judge ruled not enough evidence was presented to send the case to the Court of Common Pleas in Sunbury.
Earl Adams Sr. pleaded no contest to possession of drug paraphernalia and was ordered to pay a $50 fine. That misdemeanor charge was added to the original criminal complaints filed by Patrolman Stephen Bennick against all three defendants, but was dismissed against Linda Adams and Ross.
The charges relate to an April 15 drug raid at 122 N. Fifth St. in which police found two pounds of marijuana, ecstasy and hashish. Several vehicles, a big screen television, a computer and camera belonging to Earl and Linda Adams also were seized.
Ploy for publicity
After the raid, Targonski held a press conference at Sunbury Police Station, where investigators spread the drugs and cash across a table.
Stuck claims the press conference was nothing but a ploy to get positive publicity for Targonski who is running for DA in the Nov. 3 general election against Attorney Tony Matulewicz, a former assistant in Targonski's office.
Stuck stated at the hearing, "We would note that a $50,000 alleged drug case has turned into a $50 fine."
He also claimed that some suspected drugs found in the home turned out to be catnip.
On Wednesday, Stuck said, "There was no confirmation about what actors were involved in drug dealing. Without more than constructive possession (drugs found in the home but not in possession of a person), the DA apparently authorized the unlawful taking of several vehicles, a big screen TV, computer and camera belonging to Earl and Linda Adams, who were not culpable of unlawful activities. Additionally, without more than constructive possession, their house was decimated during the search that resulted in estimated damage approaching $7,000."
DA responds
Targonski took offense to some of Stuck's comments.
"I am appalled that Attorney Stuck would accuse me of criminal activity by implying that I used my position as a DA to a hold a press conference to promote my office," she said.
She added, "The commonwealth respects the ruling of Judge Apfelbaum, but disagrees with his decision to find Earl and Linda Adams did not have constructive possession. All the drugs were recovered in multiple areas of their home. In my opinion, there was evidence to warrant constructive possession."
Targonski said the commonwealth plans to seek forfeiture of the cash recovered from the home, which she said comes close to matching the estimated amount of damage Stuck claimed was done to his clients' home during the raid.
"If nothing else, the commonwealth was able to remove all the illegal substances from the street," Targonski said.
The DA said she was not aware of the seizure of any catnip from the home.
Targonski said the dismissed charges cannot be refiled.
No adults home
Stuck, who noted the vehicles were returned to Earl and Linda Adams about a month ago, said his clients and Ross were facing a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment and/or $15,000 fine.
He commended Toomey for amending the criminal complaint at the preliminary hearing to include the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia.
"If not for Mr. Toomey's astute addition of drug paraphernalia, everything would have been dismissed."
Stuck said Earl Adams Sr., who admitted to possessing drug paraphernalia, is a Vietnam War veteran who has been employed for 12 years at Bimbo Bakeries in Sunbury, where he was working at the time of the raid. Stuck said Linda Adams was working as a disc jockey at a family wedding in Daytona, Fla., when her home was raided by police from several municipalities, adult probation officers and Targonski.
Ross also was not at the house during the raid.
According to Stuck, Ross stays at the home periodically, but is not a permanent resident.
Juvenile case
Brandon Adams, 17, a son of Earl and Linda Adams, was home when the raid was conducted and faces the same charges filed against his parents and girlfriend. He was on probation at the time of the raid and his case will be heard in juvenile court in the fall.
The teen testified Tuesday that the drugs found in the house were his, and that his parents knew nothing about his drug dealing.
Adams, who turns 18 next month, will undergo an adjudication hearing. He initially was placed in shelter care April 15 and released from custody July 30, but remains under the supervision of juvenile authorities. Adams has completed a rehab program.
The district attorney's office pushed for the teen to be tried as an adult on the felonies while pointing out his adjudication in 2014 on drug possession charges. But during a May 28 certification hearing, Northumberland County President Judge William H. Wiest ruled that the case will proceed in juvenile court.