COAL TOWNSHIP - Bob Getchey has defended the way he acted at Tuesday's meeting of the Shamokin Area School Board.
Getchey contacted The News-Item Thursday morning, upset about an article published in that day's edition reporting on his angry exit from an executive session and his behavior surrounding a controversial vote on the privatization of the district's food services.
"I did my homework for a week. I did my homework," Getchey said, responding to a comment made by fellow Director Brian Persing questioning Getchey's preparedness in general. "I about knocked my head off thinking what I should do, what's best."
Repeated attempts were made to contact Getchey for comment Wednesday. However, the school board director said a recent health scare prevented him from returning messages left for him.
On Thursday, Getchey discussed events leading up to Tuesday's meeting.
He said Steve Curran, business manager, had given him for review the "most important" papers from a 1.5-inch thick binder containing a proposal from The Nutrition Group, a food service management company that was awarded a contract to take over Shamokin Area's cafeteria services.
Other directors had taken the whole binder to look over.
Also, he said he'd spoken about the issue with Curran, food service director Mindy Lagerman, directors Persing, Jeff Kashner and Bernie Sosnoskie as well as personnel from another school district whom he would not name.
The Nutrition Group provided two proposals for management services, each designed to save the district money.
The proposal approved on a 5-4 vote, with Getchey casting the tie-breaking vote, is said to save the district as much as $175,000. In doing so, the board handed over control of personnel to The Nutrition Group, meaning cafeteria workers will become former employees of Shamokin Area.
A second proposal had the district saving an estimated $32,290 and keeping cafeteria workers on its own payroll.
3 concerns
Getchey reiterated that he didn't have sufficient information to make a decision when he abstained from the first vote on proposed contract options with The Nutrition Group.
He said he had three concerns: whether the company would guarantee employment for district cafeteria employees; whether the company would, in the least, maintain those employees' current wages, and what options existed for employee health insurance.
(District officials have said the company would guarantee employment, maintain wages and pay for single member health coverage, with the district paying the difference for family coverage for any employee who has family coverage at present.)
All three of those concerns were addressed by Curran during a 10-minute executive session, Getchey said, and that's why he subsequently cast the deciding vote.
"The people that are working there for years are hard-working people, they're good people, and I wanted to be sure that they were protected," he said. "And if this fails, I am going to be very disappointed in our administration. I asked them these questions and they said they'd be taken care of."
Getchey said he wouldn't have voted in favor of a contract longer than one year.
"If it doesn't work out after the year, I will change my decision and I will stop it and I will never go with it again," he said.
'I got mad'
Getchey said he didn't believe his concerns could have been eased by speaking directly with representatives of The Nutrition Group, who addressed the board during a closed-door session prior to Tuesday's meeting. Getchey said he wanted answers from Curran or Superintendent James Zack.
Getchey stormed out of the executive meeting prior to the company's question-and-answer session, according to fellow directors.
Getchey denied issues surrounding the head coaching vacancy for girls basketball had anything to do with him losing his temper. Instead, he said it was a perceived lack of respect when he requested answers regarding the district swimming pool and a district-owned bus.
"Tracey (Witmer, board president) said, 'Hey this is getting out of order.' I thought she meant me and I misunderstood her and I got mad and I left," he said.
"Here I came with all this on my mind, I'm a director all these years and I don't get any respect. It had nothing to do with coaching."
He said he didn't think his temper got the best of him.
"I think I had just cause because of the way I was treated when I had the floor," he said.
On basketball
Bill Callahan will return to the bench next season to coach girls varsity basketball. Chris Zimmerman will take over the boys program.
Getchey had sought to become head coach of the girls team.
There has been much discussion about how the girls coaching job was filled and the effect that decision had on hiring a coach for the boys team.
Joe Dudeck sought the girls position, too. He claimed to be black-balled by both Getchey and Persing in his quest.
For his part, Persing kept quiet when the allegations were made during Tuesday's meeting.
Getchey responded, denying any claims that he lied or undermined Dudeck. He stood by those claims Thursday, saying he'd never done anything to keep Dudeck from obtaining the job.
After pursuing the girls job himself, Getchey said he withdrew his name when he learned Zimmerman was interested. That job was all but given to him officially, he said, because Persing made phone calls to fellow board members for approval to install Zimmerman. Getchey said he wished to wait until Tuesday's meeting to vote on the matter but his request was ignored.
When Joe Klebon, longtime boys coach and guidance counselor, announced his retirement, Zimmerman sought and was awarded the job.
With the girls gig open again, that left Dudeck and other unnamed candidates to vie for the job, Getchey said. Another option was to readvertise the position. Instead, he said a decision was made to bring back Callahan, who had resigned from the post in March.
"I don't even know as a chairman how Mr. Callahan got involved in this," Getchey said, noting Callahan has his support.
Regrets
Getchey is chairman of the athletic committee. Asked if he felt his roles as a school board director and chairman created a conflict of interest in seeking the coaching position, he said, "I thought because of the crisis with money; I was more worried about saving us money."
He said he thought he had support of fellow directors, but said he was lied to by unnamed members who claimed they wouldn't vote in his favor. He said he was also hurt by rumors that some parents of basketball players on the girls teams did not want him coaching their children, and that they would quit if he was hired.
Getchey was an assistant coach on Callahan's staff last season. He said he has more than 30 years combined coaching experience in youth girls basketball and in softball, and that his desire for the position as head girls basketball coach was not just to help the district financially but because he wanted to coach a group of girls he's coached in the past.
In the end, Getchey said he's happy that both Callahan and Zimmerman will be coaching next season.
But he's unhappy with how everything has transpired.
"Do I regret all that happened? Yes, I'm disappointed in some of the people who hurt my feelings through this," he said.